| |
|
About Reconsideration and Appeals
If the provider is unhappy about a decision made by the Agency concerning accreditation of a home, a request can be made for reconsideration of that decision by the Agency.
Requests for reconsideration should be made to the General Manager, Accreditation at the Agency’s national office (click here). The exceptions to this are applications for reconsideration of decisions about assessors, which should be submitted to the local state office of the Agency.
The provider may apply to the Agency for reconsideration of the following decisions that are made about their home:
|
RECONSIDERATIONS
|
|
Decisions that homes can ask the Agency to reconsider
|
Time within which application must be made to Agency
|
Time Agency has to reconsider
|
Time Agency has to provide written advice
|
|
To refuse application for accreditation following desk audit
|
7 days
|
7 days
|
|
Not to accredit
|
14 days
|
56 days
|
14 days
|
|
The period of accreditation
|
7 days
|
7 days
|
|
To revoke accreditation
|
14 days
|
56 days
|
14 days
|
|
Improvements required and timetable for improvement following a review audit not to revoke accreditation
|
14 days
|
14 days
|
|
Variation of period of accreditation
|
14 days
|
14 days
|
|
Refusal to include applicant’s nominated assessor on an assessment team
|
7 days
|
7 days
|
|
Refusal to uphold objection about inclusion of an assessment team member
|
14 days
|
7 days
|
Top
|
To be valid, an application for reconsideration must be in writing setting out the grounds on which reconsideration is sought, and should include one or more of the following:
- an improvement outline
- information about how the home is undertaking continuous improvement
- any other relevant information which would support the application for reconsideration.
Any improvement outline should include an explanation of the steps the home will take to demonstrate compliance with the Accreditation Standards, and a date by which those steps will be accomplished.
When making reconsideration decisions, the Agency takes into account:
- the material that was available to the original decision maker
- any written submission and/or improvement outline submitted
- reports from any further desk or site audits
- information from subsequent support contacts
- any other information that is made available concerning the home.
Top
|
Under Section 7.1 of the Accreditation Grant Principles 1999, if the provider is unhappy with a reconsideration decision by the Agency they are entitled to apply to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for a review of the decision. The Tribunal is a review authority that is independent of the Agency. The Tribunal’s website is at www.aat.gov.au.
When informing the provider of a decision which is reviewable, the Agency will advise in writing of that decision, the reasons for that decision, and provide information about how to appeal.
Reviewable decisions are outlined in section 7.1 of the Accreditation Grant Principles 1999 and include:
Appointment of assessment teams
- refusal to include an applicant’s nominated assessor in an assessment team
- refusal to accept an applicant’s objection to a quality assessor.
After accreditation decision
- decisions on re-consideration about the period for which the home is to be accredited
- refusal of an application on reconsideration.
After review audit
- variation of a period of accreditation
- revocation of an accreditation.
The Agency must continue to carry out support contacts with the home during the appeal period.
Top
|
|
|